Entry tags:
First first authorship!
I was over at Dr. K's today analyzing some data and talking her into buying me Photoshop (successfully, yay), and we were talking about getting an abstract ready for our AChemS poster submission, and she just kind of casually mentioned "first author, which would be you..."
dude, what?
Apparently I'm going to be listed as first author on this. I guess it sort of makes sense, looking back over the work that's been done in the lab since last year's conference. And I'll be the one doing the writing and layout and graphs for the poster itself. Still, I wasn't expecting this, and it feels sort of amazing.
dude, what?
Apparently I'm going to be listed as first author on this. I guess it sort of makes sense, looking back over the work that's been done in the lab since last year's conference. And I'll be the one doing the writing and layout and graphs for the poster itself. Still, I wasn't expecting this, and it feels sort of amazing.
no subject
Go you. :)
no subject
no subject
Does this mean you get to go to Florida in April?
no subject
no subject
You just have your undergrad degree, right?
ETA: Crap, does that sound bad or condescending or something? I totally mean the opposite. I think you are amazing.
no subject
no subject
I find it interesting that different fields have such different standards for author order, from alphabetical to seniority to who actually did the most work to whether your advisor is a turd.
no subject
no subject
In the area of biology, the Wikipedia article on academic authorship has this to say: "Biologists tend to place a supervisor or lab head last in an author list; organic chemists might put him or her first."
no subject
no subject