Statistics question
Oct. 9th, 2008 02:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Can anyone explain to me why the t-statistic approaches the z-score as n approaches infinity, rather than as n approaches N? Is it just assumed that an unknown population size is infinite? I asked the teacher, and she didn't know. It's not important to actual calculations, of course, because there's obviously no way for n to be greater than N; I'm just curious.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 03:19 am (UTC)But I've been writing reasoned sober shit about statistics all fucking day for my company blog - so I shall ramble....
Generally the hypothetical population you're interested in is not the actual population that exists. So, for example, if you're interested in, say, the mean height of American men, and there are N men alive in the US right now, you're actually not interested in the mean of those N, because those N are actually a sample of sorts of all possible American men that could exist. And if you took a sample of all N men, you'd actually have N-1 df, because (since there's a finite number of men), there is no freedom for the height of that last man - his height is determined by the observed height of the first N-1 men, and the actual mean height of the population. Of course, as soon as new men are born, or die, or move into or out of the US, your "population" changes, which is further evidence that N isn't actually the population of interest.
I'll be curious to learn in the morning if this made ANY sense at all.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 10:08 pm (UTC)Is there a term for the hypothetical population?