He's trying to fucking trick me.
Sep. 20th, 2005 02:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Darrell Phillips, the Penn Valley Physical Education Department Fitness Center Coordinator (according to his business card) told me yesterday to call him between nine and noon today to get an answer on the membership thing. I called him, got his machine, decided to quit playing games and trotted right on into his office.
Turns out that he doesn't want to give me a membership because if I get hurt lifting too much weight or something and the court asks him if, in his professional opinion, a fifteen-year-old should have been using the equipment unsupervised, he would have to say no. That I don't plan to use the weight machines, and that I'm willing to sign a statement agreeing not to, doesn't make a difference because see, he doesn't know that I won't randomly decide, "Hey, why don't I try to bench-press three hundred pounds and see what happens?"
How about if my parents sign a waiver agreeing that the center is not liable for any damage? No, because if something happens, insurance isn't the problem, it's the fact that he would be acting against his "professional opinion."
Why are seventeen-year-olds allowed to use the equipment unsupervised, when they are not legally very different from me? Because most people have been in puberty for a few years by age seventeen, and are therefore less likely to hurt themselves due to the fact that their bone structures have settled (or something).
I've been menstruating for over three years and am quite obviously not just beginning puberty- are there ways to tell whether or not my bone structure is ready to handle the exercise? Well, he's not a medical doctor, he's not qualified to make that decision.
And if I get a signed note from a qualified medical doctor agreeing that my bones are sufficiently ready? Well... hmmm... um... legality... weight resistance training... unsupervised... hmm... tell you what, if a signed note from a qualified medical doctor saying that it's completely safe for me to do weight resistance exercise in an unsupervised situation is produced, we're good to go.
Is a doctor likely to say that a seventeen-year-old, who can easily obtain a membership, is completely safe in the same situation?
And here he fiddled and hemmed and hawed and finally said something vague about family practitioners. I'm gonna get him, though. I could feel the blood pounding when I was standing there, having this (here much abbreviated) conversation. The guy doesn't trust me to honor a signed statement, won't acknowledge that I may be right in any way, and then he has the nerve to assume that I'm stupid enough to fall for this shit. Well, I'm not. I'm going to ask Dr. Murray for a statement saying that I am no less able to withstand weight resistance training than a typical seventeen-year-old. If they let any old seventeen-year-old have a membership, they can't refuse me one if I have that note.
Well, they can. But I'm going to fight them every step of the way. I got him to admit that the law doesn't have a restriction on age and that he's the only one I have to convince. (I asked him if it was up to him, and he said no, that the "risk coordinator" is the one that makes the decisions... then I asked for contact information for that person and he muttered, "Well, they defer to me on matters like this.") That means he has to either go back on his word or let me have my damn membership.
I need to remember to get my $39 back, because there's no way this is going through before at least October, and by then the semester will be half over.
Turns out that he doesn't want to give me a membership because if I get hurt lifting too much weight or something and the court asks him if, in his professional opinion, a fifteen-year-old should have been using the equipment unsupervised, he would have to say no. That I don't plan to use the weight machines, and that I'm willing to sign a statement agreeing not to, doesn't make a difference because see, he doesn't know that I won't randomly decide, "Hey, why don't I try to bench-press three hundred pounds and see what happens?"
How about if my parents sign a waiver agreeing that the center is not liable for any damage? No, because if something happens, insurance isn't the problem, it's the fact that he would be acting against his "professional opinion."
Why are seventeen-year-olds allowed to use the equipment unsupervised, when they are not legally very different from me? Because most people have been in puberty for a few years by age seventeen, and are therefore less likely to hurt themselves due to the fact that their bone structures have settled (or something).
I've been menstruating for over three years and am quite obviously not just beginning puberty- are there ways to tell whether or not my bone structure is ready to handle the exercise? Well, he's not a medical doctor, he's not qualified to make that decision.
And if I get a signed note from a qualified medical doctor agreeing that my bones are sufficiently ready? Well... hmmm... um... legality... weight resistance training... unsupervised... hmm... tell you what, if a signed note from a qualified medical doctor saying that it's completely safe for me to do weight resistance exercise in an unsupervised situation is produced, we're good to go.
Is a doctor likely to say that a seventeen-year-old, who can easily obtain a membership, is completely safe in the same situation?
And here he fiddled and hemmed and hawed and finally said something vague about family practitioners. I'm gonna get him, though. I could feel the blood pounding when I was standing there, having this (here much abbreviated) conversation. The guy doesn't trust me to honor a signed statement, won't acknowledge that I may be right in any way, and then he has the nerve to assume that I'm stupid enough to fall for this shit. Well, I'm not. I'm going to ask Dr. Murray for a statement saying that I am no less able to withstand weight resistance training than a typical seventeen-year-old. If they let any old seventeen-year-old have a membership, they can't refuse me one if I have that note.
Well, they can. But I'm going to fight them every step of the way. I got him to admit that the law doesn't have a restriction on age and that he's the only one I have to convince. (I asked him if it was up to him, and he said no, that the "risk coordinator" is the one that makes the decisions... then I asked for contact information for that person and he muttered, "Well, they defer to me on matters like this.") That means he has to either go back on his word or let me have my damn membership.
I need to remember to get my $39 back, because there's no way this is going through before at least October, and by then the semester will be half over.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 12:50 pm (UTC)If you're not using the weight machines, what are you doing? Maybe its possible to do that without the gym. I'd suggest a doctors note, but also maybe ponying up for one session with a trainer so that you know how to use all the equipment (often included with the membership fee).
definitely get your $39 back. And, whatever, tell the guy he's a dumbass.
But the real point is to get a gym that works for you, and maybe thats not the right solution anyway.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 01:09 pm (UTC)Yes, it's the Penn Valley gym, and yes, it's supposed to be open to all students. That's the issue, and that's why they're not laughing in my face and telling me to get lost. I am a student in good standing and they have offered this membership to students. That's why it's so cheap- the $39 is for the whole fall semester, although a month of the semester has already passed, so I'll probably just get one in the spring instead (assuming I can work all this crap out).
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 01:15 pm (UTC)good luck.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 02:46 pm (UTC)(I know he's being unreasonable, and that this is unlikely to work, but maybe it'll help in your strategy of convincing him that you're responsible enough to use the gym safely.) Anyhow, good luck, and way to go for trying to form good habits to keep yourself healthy in the long run!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 05:51 pm (UTC)I might try bringing him some articles if he still gives me shit after I get Dr. Murray's statement, though. Thanks for the suggestion.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 05:47 pm (UTC)He's also probably afraid of 15-year-olds. (Granted, you'd frighten anyone who's worried about keeping his authority. :-) )
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 05:49 pm (UTC)Awww, thanks!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 07:14 pm (UTC)Zel, as long as your under 18, your going to have to deal with unfair laws that you think are only there to piss you off. Laws and rules like this are made for the very reason you're dragging this on uneccessarily. although the bastards should give you back your $39. But in ANY adults eye's as i have found, and even in my own from time to time, they can base rules like this on experiences from when they were that age. you just have to deal with it. theres no point in fighting it.
personally, i know they shouldn't have a problem with you, but thats because i know you, they don't. the waiver thing doesn't change much, even if you don't sue, and you did hurt yourself, people would be very critical of their service because they werent watching an minor while they worked out. which would be bad for business.
its all a business standpoint, and its all a bit selfish i know, but tell me that in your entire life you've never had an instance where you wanted to protect your own interests above letting something slide.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 07:34 pm (UTC)you just have to deal with it. theres no point in fighting it.
Oh, Scott, sweetie, I'm disappointed in you. You should know me better than that.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-21 06:13 pm (UTC)fifteen year olds are more likely to do something idiotic than a seventeen year old
This is very true. 15 year olds are also more likely to injure themselves because their bodies aren't as well developed at 17 year olds. This is why i think offering to take some instruction to be sure you know how to use all the equipment (whether or not you're going to use it) is a good idea.
as long as your under 18, your going to have to deal with unfair laws it was supposed to stop when i turned 18? The truth is, there are idiotic rules and idiotic people out there, and you have be wise about what battles you choose to fight.
the waiver thing doesn't change much, even if you don't sue,
Not to mention that waivers don't stand up in a court of law very often. I wonder about parental permission slips, though.
At any rate, i think its reasonable to persue a solution for a little while. I happen to think the best way to persue a solution is to work with in your school and the gym to figure out how you can satisfy all parties.
i really think they're idiotic for both taking your money before they ascertained your age, if that was an issue, and for not having a way to deal with students younger than 17, but...