jedusor: (neuron art)
V: is this a step towards or away from self-actualization?
me: ohhhhh do not even get me STARTED on Maslow
me: >:(
V: I want to get you started on Maslow.
me: then I will never get to showering or eating, and then I will never get to your beta
me: is that what you want
me: because if you say yes, I will legit give up cleanliness and food and go on a rant about the failings of psychology as a scientific field
V: It's like you don't know me at all. YES, i want to listen to that rant. Gladly and raptly.
me: okay
much cussing and capslocking, not much respect for current psychology curricula )

Parenting

Aug. 24th, 2006 09:53 am
jedusor: (looking at the stars)
Cut for those of you not interested in children )

EDIT: The point of this post is not the meat thing. That is an example of the point of this post, which is parenting decisions and the temptation to attempt to interfere with them.
jedusor: (capslock harry)
I remember when I was little, trying to start fights by being loud and unreasonable and stomping around because I felt that I was being maligned and that everyone should join in my misery. That is exactly how my mom is currently behaving, and the fact that she accused me of being immature doesn't help, especially when it was because I did something that she does practically on a daily basis. (That would be saying, "Fine, think what you want to think, I don't want to argue about it anymore.")

That thing she does, imitating what I'm saying in a high-pitched, whiny voice? That is what I call immature, and it's one of the few things that honestly makes me want to get violent. She says she does it to make me understand how I sound to her. I am not kidding. That's how she justifies it.

This entry left public because maybe if she can't interrupt me, she'll pay attention to what I'm saying. Though I find that highly unlikely.
jedusor: (approved by jesus)
You know that fold in the top front part of your ear? It's kind of hard to clean under there, don't you think? It would be easier to just cut off that part. Then you'd never have to worry about lifting up that flap to clean under it. Wouldn't life be so much easier that way? Besides, you don't really need that part to hear. And if you had it done when you were a newborn infant, you'd never miss it, and you wouldn't remember the pain either.

Religious reasons for circumcision are tricky to argue with, not that I don't try, but I am fucking fed up with people who are in favor of it because it's "easier to clean without the foreskin."


Aaaanyway, I finished "Pride and Prejudice." Two things about it bugged me:

1. Mr. Darcy's change of character. Too sudden, too abrupt, too unbelievable. I was starting to like his character, actually, and understand a bit how his upbringing and circumstances had affected him and contributed to his overblown vanity. Then, all of a sudden, he's nice and sweet and polite and well-mannered and everyone likes him. I was seriously expecting this to be explained right up until the very end. Nope, all it says is that it happened because Elizabeth's rejection of him made him realize what a twerp he was being. Nice as it would be for life to work like that, it doesn't.

2. Jane Austen is the queen, nay, the empress of run-on sentences. Complex structure is one thing, but when I have to reread a sentence four times to understand what's being said, it really takes away from the flow of the book.

Other than that, it was good. I kind of wish I had Mr. Bennet as a dad.
jedusor: (bad vegan)
French numbers make no sense. Everything's fine and dandy and translatable until sixty-nine, then seventy is "soixante-dix" (sixty-ten), and it continues up until "soixante-dix-neuf" (sixty-ten-nine, or sixty-nineteen), then eighty is "quatre-vingts" (four-twenties). To make a long story short, "ninety-nine" is "quatre-vingts-dix-neuf" (four-twenties-ten-nine). So, uh, multiply the first two numbers, then add the second two, and you get the number you're looking for, I guess. But I'm supposed to be able to hear this and write it down as numerical figures. Also, the whole everything being masculine and feminine thing was confusing enough before we learned the feminine form of the word "masculine" and the masculine form of the word "feminine."

Regardless of this, I'm enjoying French immensely, and actually had a sorta-kinda-conversation in it with [livejournal.com profile] lizzip. Granted, it started off with me accidentally using the male article to refer to her, but I'm still happy about the able-to-communicate thing.
jedusor: (microsoft's new vacuum line)
So, I survived my honors seminar presentation, algebra quiz, and English presentation today. Remind me to post my seminar presentation background, because it was a pain in the ass and I want recognition for it.

Now I shall rant about group presentations.

I have never worked on a group project in which all members contributed equally. There is inevitably at least one slacker, and other people have to do extra work to make up, otherwise the presentation looks badly put together. I wouldn't mind so much if we were actually learning something from this, but we aren't. The slackers get the good grades they didn't earn, which doesn't exactly prevent them from doing it again (after all, what have they got to lose?) and the same thing happens the next time. There's no incentive to work hard in a group project unless no one else is, and people tend to assume someone else is.

Also, there's no real way to tell who did the most work. If the hard-working students accomplish their goal of giving a good presentation, the teacher can easily assume that everyone contributed equally and give good grades to everyone, which only perpetuates the behavior. Of course, I (being, of course, one of the slack-pick-uppers) could rat on the slackers, which teachers generally encourage, but I don't do that unless it's an anonymous peer grade. That's only happened once, in my biology class last spring, and the fact that I did practically the entire presentation and got the peer grades I deserved for it probably saved my A in that class. Still, helping one person's grade is not the purpose of group projects.

I know the logistics of individual presentations are much more difficult, especially with large class sizes, but I really, really wish teachers would assign them more.

Grah.

Nov. 6th, 2005 12:38 am
jedusor: (quote found on the 1nt4rw3bz somewhere)
I went to sleep at two AM last night and woke up at 4:45. In the afternoon. That's almost 15 hours of sleep. I have no clue why that happened. I did a little algebra homework- I think I'm finally getting the hang of factoring, thank whoever made the platypi. I watched part of an Audrey Hepburn movie with Mom and Clay, then went to the store in my pajamas. Mom managed to convince the manager of Brookside Market to let us buy one of the three Thanksgiving soda sets they're getting this year (last year the flavors were turkey and gravy, green bean casserole, mashed potato and butter, fruitcake, and cranberry). They were going to raffle them off, but Mom's grovelling apparently scared them into promising her one. I am highly amused at the entire situation.

Then everyone else was eating Bill's decidedly non-vegan pumpkin pie (with PAH written on the top... Google "weebl and bob" if you don't get it), so I had a vegan chocolate shake with soy latte and Purely Decadent in it. It was incredibly good but gave me a bit of a stomachache.

Link's been adorable lately. He likes to tilt his head back and spin around until he falls over. He can say a few words like 'dog' and 'watch,' and he's almost figured out which member of the family he's supposed to call 'Daddy'. I taught him to pull up his shirt and poke his navel when I say "Where's Lincoln's belly button?" Except he wouldn't do it today.

Cordell's being an absolute asshole about the G5, which I need to do about four-fifths of the homework I have due Monday and Tuesday (French quiz Monday, French audio both days, algebra homework both days, algebra quiz Monday, English response Tuesday, English group presentation Tuesday, twenty-five minute honors seminar presentation Tuesday, research paper for honors seminar Tuesday). He wouldn't let me have it earlier until I got Bill to tell him to, then I got up to eat dinner and when I got back, he'd taken it over again. I didn't push it then because I didn't want to get in an argument, so I waited for him to get off for about four hours (!) then finally went in there and asked him for it again, and he snottily told me he'd be off in about an hour. Of course, Bill was in bed by then, so I couldn't do anything about it. He's still on there, but even if I could get him off, I can't start anything now because it's one AM and I need to be at church for childcare by 8:30. Bill kicks Cord off when he's around to do it, but he usually isn't, and Mom's being less than helpful- can't I wait, he said he'd be off in five minutes, why are you making such a big deal out of it, just use one of the laptops, etc. I can't use a laptop because a) my French audio is on the G5, b) what I have so far of my English and honors seminar research is all on the G5, c) I want to keep all my work on one computer and the white laptop is entirely unreliable, and d) even if I could do it on another computer, it is not cool for Cordell to think it's okay to behave like this. It would be one thing if he was doing something important, but he isn't. He's chatting on IM, burning DVDs of anime, and posting on video game forums. And what he's learned from this so far is that Mom just wants to avoid conflict, and to pull this shit when Bill's asleep/not here. Life skills? Right.

By the way, he has a job now. But he's at the job while I'm at school, so we still want the computer at the same time. I think he needs to be out of the house providing for himself, but I seem to be overruled on that one. Three more months until he turns 18, though, then I think Bill will be pushing to get him out of here too. Hopefully.
jedusor: (i hate men)
Darrell Phillips, the Penn Valley Physical Education Department Fitness Center Coordinator (according to his business card) told me yesterday to call him between nine and noon today to get an answer on the membership thing. I called him, got his machine, decided to quit playing games and trotted right on into his office.

Turns out that he doesn't want to give me a membership because if I get hurt lifting too much weight or something and the court asks him if, in his professional opinion, a fifteen-year-old should have been using the equipment unsupervised, he would have to say no. That I don't plan to use the weight machines, and that I'm willing to sign a statement agreeing not to, doesn't make a difference because see, he doesn't know that I won't randomly decide, "Hey, why don't I try to bench-press three hundred pounds and see what happens?"

How about if my parents sign a waiver agreeing that the center is not liable for any damage? No, because if something happens, insurance isn't the problem, it's the fact that he would be acting against his "professional opinion."

Why are seventeen-year-olds allowed to use the equipment unsupervised, when they are not legally very different from me? Because most people have been in puberty for a few years by age seventeen, and are therefore less likely to hurt themselves due to the fact that their bone structures have settled (or something).

I've been menstruating for over three years and am quite obviously not just beginning puberty- are there ways to tell whether or not my bone structure is ready to handle the exercise? Well, he's not a medical doctor, he's not qualified to make that decision.

And if I get a signed note from a qualified medical doctor agreeing that my bones are sufficiently ready? Well... hmmm... um... legality... weight resistance training... unsupervised... hmm... tell you what, if a signed note from a qualified medical doctor saying that it's completely safe for me to do weight resistance exercise in an unsupervised situation is produced, we're good to go.

Is a doctor likely to say that a seventeen-year-old, who can easily obtain a membership, is completely safe in the same situation?

And here he fiddled and hemmed and hawed and finally said something vague about family practitioners. I'm gonna get him, though. I could feel the blood pounding when I was standing there, having this (here much abbreviated) conversation. The guy doesn't trust me to honor a signed statement, won't acknowledge that I may be right in any way, and then he has the nerve to assume that I'm stupid enough to fall for this shit. Well, I'm not. I'm going to ask Dr. Murray for a statement saying that I am no less able to withstand weight resistance training than a typical seventeen-year-old. If they let any old seventeen-year-old have a membership, they can't refuse me one if I have that note.

Well, they can. But I'm going to fight them every step of the way. I got him to admit that the law doesn't have a restriction on age and that he's the only one I have to convince. (I asked him if it was up to him, and he said no, that the "risk coordinator" is the one that makes the decisions... then I asked for contact information for that person and he muttered, "Well, they defer to me on matters like this.") That means he has to either go back on his word or let me have my damn membership.

I need to remember to get my $39 back, because there's no way this is going through before at least October, and by then the semester will be half over.

Profile

jedusor: (Default)
jedusor

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 05:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios