Dan Savage on the CDC's new recommendation that all menstruating women should be treated as "pre-pregnant":
Color me paranoid, but ordering American women to regard themselves as "pre-pregnant" because they may harm a fetus they don't know they're carrying opens the door to prosecuting women who harm their fetuses by failing to regard themselves as "pre-pregnant." How long until "women should... refrain from smoking [and] maintain a healthy body weight" becomes "women must..." Does that sound paranoid? Well, so did a war on contraception once.
Oddly enough, Bush's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention doesn't urge straight men to regard themselves as existing in a perpetual state of "pre-fatherhood." Smoking, obesity, asthma, and diabetes could seriously hamper a man's ability to do the heavy lifting that comes with fatherhood. But Bush's CDC doesn't seem that interested in regulating the behavior of all those fat, smoking pre-fathers out there.
Gee. Isn't. That. Weird.
There is a bright side in the CDC's announcement: If we're going to regard all females as pre-pregnant, then we can, as my friend Gomez points out, regard all virgins as merely pre-fucked.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 06:48 pm (UTC)You should have a "Dan answered my letter!" T-shirt, you lucky kid.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 01:51 am (UTC)