jedusor: (neuron art)
[livejournal.com profile] jillcook commented on that entry about yawning and mirror neurons, saying that her nephew is autistic and doesn't seem to yawn. So I did some googling and it turns out that hey, somebody else already thought of this. Severely autistic kids didn't yawn at all in response to other people yawning, while kids on the milder end of the autism spectrum yawned less than neurotypical kids.

The connection to mirror neurons is still just speculation, but then basically everything about mirror neurons is speculation at this point. I hope a bunch of breakthroughs happen in neuroanatomical research methods soon so we can start figuring this crap out, because it's really friggin' neat.
jedusor: (badass geek)
Okay, so mirror neurons (neurons that fire the same way when you engage in a behavior and when you observe others engaging in the same behavior) might be involved in empathy. There's not a ton of research supporting that yet, but I think it makes a lot of sense.

I also think it makes sense for mirror neurons to be integral to the phenomenon of contagious yawning. (Apologies in advance as everyone reading this starts feeling that urge.) Kids develop theory of mind around age 4, and start yawning in response to videos of yawning around age 5. Tons of potential third variables there, I know. Just a thought.

Now I really want to go find some sociopaths and yawn at them to see if they yawn too. Or autistic people, I suppose, but there are even more potential third variables in that population.
jedusor: (don't dream it)
When I was maybe eight years old, I decided I wanted to be nineteen. Everyone else wanted to be eighteen, but I figured it would be better to place my ideal later, after I'd had some experience at adulthood. (An extra year seemed, to me, like plenty of time to iron out the kinks.) I considered aiming for after the drinking age, but that was old. Besides, I was pretty sure--accurately--that obtaining alcohol wouldn't be a problem for me if I wanted it. Also, although I only realize this in retrospect, the word "nineteen" is very aesthetically attractive in my mind.

I was wrong about many things when I was eight, but I was right about this one; nineteen has been a really great year for me. It started at the IJA festival, when my birthday was announced at the juniors competition. I got a Kit and had an extremely lucrative adventure in New York City, then I got a Mike and my first real apartment. I took cell bio and physiology and signal transduction, and really got biology as a whole, where I'd only had fragments and glimpses before. I got to spend some time with each of my brothers, and connected with the older two on a more adult level than we'd been able to when we were living together as adolescents. I was a TA, which was a valuable experience. I wrote my undergraduate thesis, which was actually pretty fun, even as it was kicking my ass. I graduated from college, and I got my first salaried job. I think my baseline happiness has been higher this past year than any previous year. There have been a lot of high points, and the low points have been mild and few.

Today, I deposited the last of the checks my dad has been sending me for college, meaning that from now on I'll be supporting myself entirely. Tomorrow, I turn 20 years old. I'm hoping the next year will be as awesome as this past one.

So kudos, eight-year-old me. Well predicted.
jedusor: (@cave)
It's weird, how I don't really realize at the time how much stuff I'm learning in my classes. I was just thinking about how I was getting about seven or eight hours of sleep a night this past semester and it never felt like anywhere near enough, whereas for the past week, I've been sleeping in four- or five-hour snatches every thirty hours or so--not because I'm stressed out or have to be awake for anything, just because I'm not tired.

And this makes sense! Because this past couple of weeks, I've mostly been hanging around the apartment doing nothing. During the semester, I was constantly going places and doing things and worrying about things, and that wears out my body in ways that I understand. When I'm spending hours at a time focusing on a single aspect of biology, like you do in classes, it's easy to completely fail to notice my awareness of the entire organism improving.

But it has been. I can't even explain it, really. I just have this sense of myself as the combination of all the bits of me, this understanding of who I am that's built from all the various little understandings I've had throughout my neuroscience and cell biology and physiology and signal transduction classes.

I am so glad to have the education I've had so far, and so eager to keep going. I'm incredibly lucky.

An idea

May. 4th, 2010 10:56 am
jedusor: (ventromedial prefrontal cortex)
I was just texting [livejournal.com profile] ertchin about a really neat TED talk in which Bobby McFerrin did a great demonstration of how well we recognize and extrapolate from patterns (I'm on my phone, so I can't link it, but it's not hard to find) and I had an idea: a TED talk discussion group. Just get together with a couple of friends, watch TED talks, and talk about them.

In fact, there's no way I'm the first person to think of this. Do these exist?
jedusor: (unsatisfactory situation)
If you say something sexist or racist or heterosexist or whatever unintentionally--if you honestly had no idea that there was anything wrong with what you said--then I agree that it's not a reason for people to get mad at you. It's an acceptable reason for people to avoid you, if they don't feel like trying to educate you, but it's not reasonable to get angry if you truly had no idea. Obliviousness is not necessarily your fault.

If, however, someone says, "Hey, dude, that wasn't cool, and here's why," then appropriate responses are "I disagree, and here's why," or "oh, I'm sorry!" If someone calls you out and your reaction is, "You're being oversensitive and not understanding my intentions," then you are being a jerk. Ignorance is only an excuse when you're still ignorant.

A thought

Feb. 5th, 2010 02:31 pm
jedusor: (Default)
The whole point of human existence--the whole point of the existence of any organism--is to reproduce. That's basic biology. It's self-preservation once removed; by having babies, we make sure there's as much of us left in the world when we leave as possible.

I think I'm just as driven to pass myself along as anyone, but not genetically. For me, what's important is the stuff that happened to me after the blueprints were done. I care about what experience has done to my neurons, not the initial tabula rasa configuration. I want to share my knowledge, my thoughts, my gradually changing perception of the world as I find out more about it. Genetics affects all that, certainly, but all it gives us is potential. It's experience that determines, in the long run, who we are.

Maybe that's why I blog. Maybe that's why one of my favorite feelings in the world is the feeling I get when I phrase something a certain way and someone looks at me and goes, "WHOA. Yes. That." Maybe that's why, despite all my certainty that I never want biological children, I've always left the possibility of adoption open. It's because the DNA isn't what's important to me. The ideas are.

Maybe teaching wouldn't be so terrible a career path for me, after all.
jedusor: (ventromedial prefrontal cortex)
I've been sitting here for fifteen minutes, watching the world go by and thinking about its physiology, how insane and wonderful it is that everything works so well, that existence has come as far as it has and that it has the potential to just keep getting cooler.

Every time I say something like that, my friends start getting all nostalgic for college. Does that mean you grownups never get caught up in the sheer awesomeness of everything anymore?
jedusor: (ventromedial prefrontal cortex)
From what I've seen, the process of altering controversial beliefs (religious, political, moral, etc.) tends to follow a pattern: kids fervently uphold their parents' views when they're young, then start to listen to enough of the counterarguments to become agnostic on the issue, then pay no attention to it for a while, and then finally decide to actually focus on the question and make a decision about it. I've seen this happen with the change from conservative to liberal, the change from religious to atheist, the change from atheist to religious, the change from omnivorous to vegetarian or vegan, and a host of others. The final perspective isn't always in opposition to the original--my opinion on abortion followed these steps from knee-jerk blind acceptance of one side (of course abortion should be legal, and you're just wrong if you think otherwise) to ambiguity and active ignorance (I'm not sure what I think, and I'd really rather not talk about it) to a period of careful consideration, after which I settled on my original opinion, but with actual reasons and a new capability of discussing it on a rational level. That period of indecision and not thinking about it is, I think, important to the process, and I've discovered through interactions with a lot of people that pressing the issue when someone's in that stage is about as pointless and frustrating as trying to argue with someone who's knee-jerk convinced that they're right.

My mother is--surprisingly, for someone normally so adamantly in favor of scientific progress--against vaccination. None of her kids, including me, were vaccinated when she had control over the decision. I believe Clayton and Lincoln have still never been vaccinated; Cordell had to get his shots before he could go to Japan, and I had to get mine before I could come to Clark. I've been in the "ignoring the decision" stage for a few years on this. I thought about it a little when I got jabbed for Clark, but I think I was still not quite ready to attack the issue.

I just read an article about it in Wired, and now I'm ready to take a look at the science and make a decision. So: tell me what you think, and back up your position with links and names and studies that I can look into. I suspect most of my flist is pro-vaccination; if you aren't, and you're afraid of getting jumped on, feel free to contact me privately or delete your comment immediately (I'll get it e-mailed to me).

EDIT: Please be civil.

On "home"

May. 14th, 2009 10:29 am
jedusor: (Default)
So, there's something I don't get.

I've always looked forward to turning eighteen and moving out. My family rocks, but I never had a choice about moving in with them. Besides, moving out is what you do when you grow up, right? You do your own thing, you make your own way in the world, you get your own physical space as well as the space to make your own decisions.

I know I'm not the only person who takes this approach. Sure, there are plenty of people who stay with their families into adulthood, and that's fine if that's how you do things. But there were also plenty of people alongside me throughout adolescence, chomping at the bit to get out of their houses the day they hit eighteen. And some of them--not all, but some--did.

This is not unexpected, is it? As a country, we grant people legal adulthood at eighteen. It shouldn't be a surprise that some of us grab that and run with it. And yet both socially and bureaucratically, it's assumed that young people have a "home" with their parents. Clark refused to accept my college mailbox as my current address; since I now have an off-campus apartment, I called to change it to this one, and they initially refused to change it because it's a "summer residence, not a permanent residence." Financial aid is impossible to get without taking parental income information into account until the student is 25, even if the parents refuse to pay a cent; I know several people who have been thoroughly screwed over by this policy. I can't count the number of people who have asked whether I'm "going home" for a school break or for the summer, and telling them that I live here only gets a confused "I thought you were from California?"

It's not just college students, either. I hear real grownups with houses and kids and everything referring to visiting their parents as "going home." I don't understand. I visit my family members, and I enjoy those visits, but they're visits. When I go to Davis, where I was born and spent my childhood, it's pleasantly familiar as the place I grew up, but it's not home. To me, home is where I go at the end of the day. That was my parents' house, once. Then it was my grandparents' house. Then it was a dorm room. Now it's an apartment in Worcester, Massachusetts, with a couple of near-strangers who seem pretty nice. In the future, it might be my own place, or a place I share with people I love; it might be P's couch in Lyon, if I ever manage to get my butt across the Atlantic; it might even be an actual house of my own someday, unlikely as settling down feels to me now. But "home" doesn't mean someplace far away that I only see once or twice a year, and it seems very strange to me that that's what others expect it to mean.

Five years

Jan. 6th, 2009 04:03 pm
jedusor: (don't dream it)
I've been hearing all sorts of scary things about LJ's layoffs and people moving their blogs elsewhere and the sky falling, so I decided to look into backup options. As I was doing so (this entry seems to be a good links roundup; please let me know if you're aware of other possibilities) I started wondering just how long I've had this journal. It's been a while, and by complete coincidence, today happened to be the day that I went back and checked the date of my first entry.

January 6th, 2004. Today is my fifth LJ-versary.

It feels a little weird to care about that--it's just a blog, you know? But the five years between ages thirteen and eighteen is a pretty damn important five years, and LJ has been an important part of adolescence for me, both as a place to organize my thoughts and as a social network.

So... cheers, LJ. Cheers to Lizzie, to Perrine, to Kate and Jen Erin and Nattie; to Ava, and to everyone else I've met through this journal.
jedusor: (ventromedial prefrontal cortex)
I think one of the most important realizations that push the transition from adolescence to adulthood is that failing to express affection for the people you care about does not make you cool.

It's not universal, obviously, because people are different (some have the opposite problem of expressing affection indiscriminately and thus making people who don't know them well uncomfortable), but that aloof demeanor is definitely one of the things I see most in teenagers, and in people who aren't teenagers anymore but haven't gotten their shit together enough to grow up.
jedusor: (riverdancing)
Ever since Kate moved out, I've been wanting to get one of those big pillows with arms and turn the other bed into a couch. I don't have the time or money to go out and buy a pillow like that, but as fate would have it, I spotted one in the trash can by the stairwell a few days ago.

Of course, it looked like this. )

I rescued it, dug a needle and thread out of my random-crap drawer, and got to work.

Ta-da! )

We've talked about self-efficacy a lot in my social psych class. At first glance, it seems like an unnecessary synonym for self-esteem, but the more I think about it with regards to my own life, the more I see the difference. It's one thing to assure myself that I'm good enough; it's another thing entirely to do things well and feel capable because I did them well.

I think that's why abstract, pointless things like honors designations and good grades don't really make me feel good about myself. I mean, they do to some extent, but it's mostly because I know they should. Something little like this, though, finding a pillow in the trash and fixing it--not perfectly, perhaps, and I hope the textiles-inclined among my flist don't look too closely at those seams--that kind of pride feels more real, more honest.
jedusor: (looking at the stars)
"Consistency in the midst of the search is no great virtue."

--Howard Becker, Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It
jedusor: (don't dream it)
A prospective student and her mother stopped me on the quad a few minutes ago. They asked if I was a student; I said I was. They explained that the girl is thinking about transferring to Clark; I told them I'd just transferred. They asked about various aspects of college life; I was surprised at the extent to which I could answer, having been here only a month and a half. The girl said she was trying to decide whether to major in business or in psychology; I told her about Dr. Gendron (the director of the Innovation and Entrepreneurship program) and the psychology program here. She mentioned that she was considering Northeastern; I told her I'd almost gone there, and described the co-op program. They thanked me for my help and asked where the admissions office was; I pointed them in the right direction and continued on my way to the library.

I spent three years being that girl. It's still hard to believe I'm out of that state of limbo. I'm the established student now, the one who's conveniently walking across the quad to the library when you need advice. I'm done searching. I've found my place.

(At least until grad school.)
jedusor: (don't dream it)
I just picked up my mail, and it consisted of a bank statement, a check, a medical bill (more than $200, ouch), and a letter about a loan. This is the kind of stuff people warned me about when I was a kid and said I wanted to grow up. Bills and taxes and responsibility are no fun, they said. Well, y'know what? It's totally worth it. So far, the positives of adulthood far outweigh the negatives.

I've been dwelling on a flaw of mine, and then realized that several of the people I admire most share that flaw. So I feel a little better about that. Mom always says you become who you admire, and that's really true, I suppose. That was the basis for the essay that got me in here, actually.

I seem to have made a good impression on the dean of students and the head of the psychology department. Someone said on Facebook that it's because I actually care about what I'm learning. I know it's beneficial to me to stand out in that regard, but I wish I didn't; I wish more people cared.

I miss Ava.
jedusor: (Default)
I've been called a crazy irrational tree-hugger without any respect for facts, and I've been called a cold scientific-minded student who can't accept anything without published evidence. Some people tease me about being vegan and enjoying pagan gatherings; others hear a description of the Whole Earth Festival and express astonishment that I would be caught dead at such a wifty event.

I've been aware of this odd discrepancy for some time, but it's been particularly noticeable recently because of the ramifications of certain people perceiving me as one way or the other. I've been learning about self-presentation and judgment of others in social psychology, and that's definitely helped me understand what's going on here. People behave differently in different situations. In a classroom situation, or with people who are more analytical in general, I'm going to try to be as rational and objective as I can, and I'm going to question people's assumptions. If I'm at the Gaia Goddess Gathering in the middle of the woods, I'm not going to argue cartography with the chick in the tie-dye scarf who's drawing energy and passion from the south. Scientific research isn't about wifty stuff, and hippie culture isn't about empirical testing. And people who see me in one of those situations are not likely to see me in the other.

The most interesting thing about this for me is that they're not making a mistake by seeing me one way or the other. The way I present myself has everything to do with others' impressions of me as a person. The problem only arises when someone refuses to acknowledge evidence that other aspects of me exist (as has definitely happened from both sides of this particular dichotomy). That's the fundamental attribution error, and it's a pain in the ass.

I desperately want to reread The Phantom Tollbooth now.
jedusor: (don't dream it)
I had a crappy day today. I was going to post about it, but then I went outside to put an envelope in the mailbox at the end of our bazillion-foot driveway, and I sort of forgot about the crappiness.

I complain about living in the middle of nowhere, but sometimes this area just overwhelms me with its beauty. In the near-pitch-blackness of midnight, feeling the cool air on my skin, listening to the silence that just doesn't happen in cities... all the drama and worry and physical discomfort faded away.

This area really is gorgeous. I wouldn't want to stay here, but I'm glad I got the time here that I did. I'm glad I got to know my grandparents as people rather than as the free vending machines they seemed to be when I was a kid. I'm glad I got to know myself a little, as is inevitable when spending so much time alone. I'm glad I got to know what it's like to not live within ten blocks of everything I need in my daily life.

It's beautiful here during the day, too, when there are animals and clouds and incredible views. But it's at night, when I go out to the mailbox, that I fall in love with this place. It's dark, and it's quiet, and I'm alone, and for a few minutes, the urgency of to-do lists and daily life just doesn't exist.

I'm going to miss that.
jedusor: (blame my parents)
I talked to S yesterday for a good two and a half hours. We haven't spoken since before we both moved from Kansas City to California in July. She's living a couple hours' drive away from me with her boyfriend, and she has a job caring for mentally ill people during the day, and she sounds really happy.

Something that kept coming up in the conversation was the fact that she's now responsible for herself instead of having her parents dictate her life, which is a huge change for her. She told me that it's wonderful to experience the natural consequences to her actions instead of always feeling ashamed and worrying about parental disapproval. Now she does things because it's to the benefit of herself and others to do them, not because she's worried about her privileges being taken away. She informed me enthusiastically that she has stayed up late and then been unable to perform to the best of her abilities at work the next day, and that that's teaching her not to stay up too late.

I didn't have a whole lot of context for this revelation, because natural consequences are the basis of my mom's parenting methods. She's always tried to let us learn lessons for ourselves, pointing them out if we didn't figure out the connections between our actions and the consequences, and trying to match the crime to the punishment when punishment had to be dished out. I remember my dad's punishments, way back when I was small enough not to know how to stop him bullying me, and I never learned anything from them besides to be afraid of him and to be dishonest when caught. Thankfully, he wasn't a large enough part of my life to cause much serious damage.

So thanks, Mom. You had the right idea.
jedusor: (Default)
I just read a surprisingly interesting article on highway fonts, linked in [livejournal.com profile] 530nm330hz's journal. I had trouble telling the difference between Highway Gothic and Clearview until I read the part about the shape of the words, and then I totally got it. Clearview places the letters closer together and narrows the gap in height between capital and lower-case letters, and that really does help form the shape of the word. Looking at it from that point of view, I could immediately tell the two apart.

I had a conversation a while ago with Mark and [livejournal.com profile] kat_nano about word shapes. Words have always had shapes in my mind, but I wasn't at all conscious of it until I tried to describe it. They're very definite shapes, but I couldn't express many of them to Kat, who seemed fascinated by the concept. "Shapes" might not even be the right term. They're not three-dimensional, and they move. No, not move. Flow. A sentence, if I focus on it, is like a complicated dance in my mind. When there's a spelling error, or even sometimes a grammar error, I know that something is wrong before I process the specific mistake because there's a skip, a misstep, in the dance.

Kat wanted to know if the shapes had color; to me, that was like asking whether wind has color. It's not an applicable question. I can't see them, exactly, nor feel them. I just know them. I tried to show her a few by waving my hands around, but I felt like an idiot more often than I felt like I was getting the sense of it across.

She asked if a movement ever reminded me of a word, and I said yes, but couldn't think of any examples. The next day, bagging groceries, I realized that the movement my hand makes when I open a freezer bag is the shape of the word "pot." It's the word that has the shape, not the meaning- the shape is the same whether the word refers to marijuana or cooking. Most word shapes don't correspond with actual body movements, though. The dance isn't done with a body, imagined or otherwise; it's a dance of words, and words only.

Some of the shapes correspond to their meanings, and some don't. The shape of the word "dress" feels like pulling up a handful of fabric in a swooping way, with a quick upward movement (leaving loose pleats in the swoop) on the right-hand side. It has to be the right because the "ess" part of the word is on the right, but that's not the case for all words; "over" moves to the left, and the center of the word (the part the movement is passing over) is the "v". I don't really think any of that makes sense outside my mind, though, and even if it does, the shape you're imagining probably isn't the same one I'm imagining.

"Does" is like a horse's neck facing left, with the "s" as a sort of fringe of mane, but only in that pronunciation. If you're referring to multiple female deer, it's a different shape, with more of a break between the "o" and the "e". The neck is more horizontal if the D is capitalized.

By becoming aware of these shapes, I've realized why I can't learn words without knowing how they're spelled. Sounds don't have shapes to me. (I suppose sound must have some bearing if pronunciation affects shapes, but words that are spelled differently but sound alike are also differently shaped. "Affect" and "effect" are not the same shape.) This is also probably why I have difficulty remembering words in languages that don't use the alphabet I'm familiar with.

I'm very curious about what you all think of this.

Profile

jedusor: (Default)
jedusor

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 12:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios